Relationship between demographic and social variables and performance in virtual reality among healthcare personnel: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality is emerging as an important component of medical education. Although the benefits of virtual reality are apparent, the optimal strategy to orient to or differentiate learners in the virtual space have not been delineated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between demographic variables, social variables, and self-perceived comfort with technology to performance on a standardized non-medical virtual reality experience. METHODS: This observational study was performed at the International Meeting on Simulation in Healthcare in 2022. This conference includes medical and non-medical attendees. Participants provided demographic information and participated in a scored non-medical VR experience due to the heterogeneity of the sample. Participants then completed a System Usability Index and NASA Task Load Index form. Participants were dividedintolow scoring, medium scoring, and high scoring groups according to their final game score for further analysis. RESULTS: 95 participants were included in final analysis. 55 (57.9%) of participants had prior virtual reality experience. Higher scores were associated with younger age (11.09, p < 0.001), identifying as male (11.09, p < 0.001), and a higher frequency of playing video games in the past (18.96, p < 0.001). The high score group was more likely to report comfort with virtual reality (6.29, p = 0.003) as well as comfort with new technology (4.61, p = 0.012). NASA Task Load Index scores trended down and System Usability Index scores trended up with increasing score. Being a nurse was a positive predictor of a higher score when compared to physicians in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Performance during an immersive virtual reality experience was most closely related to age, gender, and frequency of playing video games. Self-perceived comfort with virtual reality was more predictive of score than prior virtual reality experience.

Human dissection for anesthesiology resident training augments anatomical knowledge and clinical skills.

Anatomy is an essential component of clinical anesthesiology. The use of simulated patients and alternative materials, including embalmed human bodies, have become increasingly common during resident physician training due to the deemphasis on anatomical education during undergraduate medical training. In this report, the need for a more extensive review of relevant anatomy for the practice of anesthesiology was addressed by the design, evaluation, and dissemination of a human dissection course for procedural training of anesthesiology residents. The course utilized "freedom art" embalmed human bodies that allowed trainees to perform ultrasound-based regional and neuraxial techniques followed by detailed dissections of critical anatomy. One hundred and four residents participated in workshops and small group discussions and were evaluated using pre- and post-course assessments. A variety of clinical techniques were performed on the bodies, including regional blocks and neuraxial catheter placement. Insertion of peripheral/neuraxial catheters was successful, with dissections demonstrating the expected placement. Assessment scores improved following the course (pre-course mean 52.7%, standard deviation (σ) 13.1%; post-course mean 72.2%, σ 11.6%; t-test p < 0.0001) and feedback highlighted the usefulness and clinical relevance of course content. The ability to correlate ultrasound imaging with subsequent dissections of the "blocked" area and visualization of dye staining was extremely relevant for spatial understanding of the anatomy relevant for the clinical practice of these techniques. This manuscript demonstrates successful implementation of a comprehensive course for anesthesiology resident physicians to address gaps in undergraduate anatomical education and suggests that broader adoption of dissection courses may be beneficial for training anesthesiologists.

Is There an Association between Platelet Count and Blood Loss in the Parturient? A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of thrombocytopenia on blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) has been conflicting. Our aim was to determine if there is an association between predelivery platelet count and quantitative blood loss (QBL) and PPH in both vaginal (VD) and cesarean deliveries (CD). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective database study at a single institution from April 1, 2017 to September 9, 2020. The platelet count closest to time of delivery and the QBL was assessed separately for VD and CD. RESULTS: A total of 22,479 records were reviewed, of which 16,822 (75%) were VD and 5,657 (25%) were CD. A total of 2,600 (12%) patients had thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count <150,000/mm3. Of these, 1,980 (76%) had a VD and 620 (24%) had CD. We found a statistically significant difference in QBL between parturients with thrombocytopenia compared with those without, with a median estimated difference in QBL of 25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-32) and 57 mL (95% CI: 31-87) in VD and CD patients, respectively. We also found a statistically significant difference in QBL when comparing patients among all the platelet count ranges except in the lowest platelet count range of 50,000 to 69,999/mm3 with a mean difference of 52 (95% CI: 25-81) and 107 mL (95% CI: 39-180) in the VD and CD patients, respectively in the platelet count range of 70,000 to 99,999/mm3 . We also found the incidence of PPH was greater in those with thrombocytopenia, p < 0.001, but the median difference in QBL in all platelet groups was small. CONCLUSION: We found a statistically significant association between lower predelivery platelet counts and QBL and PPH. The clinical significance of these results is debatable, because at all platelet count ranges, differences in blood loss were small. KEY POINTS: · Hemorrhage is etiology of morbidity and mortality in obstetric parturients.. · We found a small increase in blood loss in those with thrombocytopenia.. · The clinical relevance of these findings is debatable since the increased blood loss was small..